登陆注册
5270400000096

第96章

Inasmuch as no rules are laid down for those who argue for the sake of training and of examination:-and the aim of those engaged in teaching or learning is quite different from that of those engaged in a competition; as is the latter from that of those who discuss things together in the spirit of inquiry: for a learner should always state what he thinks: for no one is even trying to teach him what is false; whereas in a competition the business of the questioner is to appear by all means to produce an effect upon the other, while that of the answerer is to appear unaffected by him; on the other hand, in an assembly of disputants discussing in the spirit not of a competition but of an examination and inquiry, there are as yet no articulate rules about what the answerer should aim at, and what kind of things he should and should not grant for the correct or incorrect defence of his position:-inasmuch, then, as we have no tradition bequeathed to us by others, let us try to say something upon the matter for ourselves.

The thesis laid down by the answerer before facing the questioner's argument is bound of necessity to be one that is either generally accepted or generally rejected or else is neither: and moreover is so accepted or rejected either absolutely or else with a restriction, e.g. by some given person, by the speaker or by some one else. The manner, however, of its acceptance or rejection, whatever it be, makes no difference: for the right way to answer, i.e. to admit or to refuse to admit what has been asked, will be the same in either case. If, then, the statement laid down by the answerer be generally rejected, the conclusion aimed at by the questioner is bound to be one generally accepted, whereas if the former be generally accepted, the latter is generally rejected: for the conclusion which the questioner tries to draw is always the opposite of the statement laid down. If, on the other hand, what is laid down is generally neither rejected nor accepted, the conclusion will be of the same type as well. Now since a man who reasons correctly demonstrates his proposed conclusion from premisses that are more generally accepted, and more familiar, it is clear that (1) where the view laid down by him is one that generally is absolutely rejected, the answerer ought not to grant either what is thus absolutely not accepted at all, or what is accepted indeed, but accepted less generally than the questioner's conclusion. For if the statement laid down by the answerer be generally rejected, the conclusion aimed at by the questioner will be one that is generally accepted, so that the premisses secured by the questioner should all be views generally accepted, and more generally accepted than his proposed conclusion, if the less familiar is to be inferred through the more familiar.

Consequently, if any of the questions put to him be not of this character, the answerer should not grant them. (2) If, on the other hand, the statement laid down by the answerer be generally accepted without qualification, clearly the conclusion sought by the questioner will be one generally rejected without qualification. Accordingly, the answerer should admit all views that are generally accepted and, of those that are not generally accepted, all that are less generally rejected than the conclusion sought by the questioner. For then he will probably be thought to have argued sufficiently well. (3)

Likewise, too, if the statement laid down by the answerer be neither rejected generally nor generally accepted; for then, too, anything that appears to be true should be granted, and, of the views not generally accepted, any that are more generally accepted than the questioner's conclusion; for in that case the result will be that the arguments will be more generally accepted. If, then, the view laid down by the answerer be one that is generally accepted or rejected without qualification, then the views that are accepted absolutely must be taken as the standard of comparison: whereas if the view laid down be one that is not generally accepted or rejected, but only by the answerer, then the standard whereby the latter must judge what is generally accepted or not, and must grant or refuse to grant the point asked, is himself. If, again, the answerer be defending some one else's opinion, then clearly it will be the latter's judgement to which he must have regard in granting or denying the various points. This is why those, too, who introduce other's opinions, e.g. that 'good and evil are the same thing, as Heraclitus says,' refuse to admit the impossibility of contraries belonging at the same time to the same thing; not because they do not themselves believe this, but because on Heraclitus' principles one has to say so.

The same thing is done also by those who take on the defence of one another's positions; their aim being to speak as would the man who stated the position.

同类推荐
  • Jeanne d'Arc

    Jeanne d'Arc

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 法藏碎金录诗话辑录

    法藏碎金录诗话辑录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 御选语录

    御选语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 佛说宝如来三昧经

    佛说宝如来三昧经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • The Brethren

    The Brethren

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 历史大搏杀

    历史大搏杀

    这是一本诠释中国帝王集团政权博弈的大作。作者以宏大的历史视野,审视中国两千年的帝制发展,揭示了隐潜在历史表象之下的潜规则,即围绕着帝王,外戚、太监、士人官僚集团以及其他势力为了争权或合纵或连横,乃至兵戎相见的残酷血腥。作者这样说过:“研究中国帝王史,上要看政权操控者即不同的统治集团,下要看基层组织,同时更要看到历史大势的变迁,这才是研究历史的初衷,这样才能有所收获。”读过《历史大搏杀》,你会惊奇地说:“原来故事中还有故事!历史可以见证未来!”黑格尔认为,中国文明是静止的,停滞的,是没有历史的。
  • 古林如禅师语录

    古林如禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 黄绣球

    黄绣球

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 稼軒先生年譜

    稼軒先生年譜

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 外交与各国历史纵横谈(中国历史纵横谈)

    外交与各国历史纵横谈(中国历史纵横谈)

    直观的介绍历史发展进程,配以深沉的文字叙述,全方位介绍了中华文明的历史,内容涵盖政治、军事、经济、文化、外交、科技、法律、宗教、艺术等领域,具有很强的系统性、知识性和可读性,不仅是广大读者学习中国历史知识的读物,也是各级图书馆珍藏的版本。
  • 冷君难缠:驭兽狂妃吻上瘾

    冷君难缠:驭兽狂妃吻上瘾

    【1v1男女双洁,女主成长型,男主超强!】她是华夏中级驭兽师,一朝醒来,成了被太子抛弃,赐婚给瞎子王爷的傻女。后来她才发现,那个传说中瞎眼禁欲信佛的王爷,完全不是那么回事儿,什么瞎、什么禁欲,全是狗屁,甚至还不是个人。【真身篇】顾倾城惊讶看着手中红色的鳞片。“蛇……一条大蛇?”“不是,不过你想骑,也可以!”某人声音邪魅。【吃肉篇】某人一定要吃肉,折腾到三更半夜,顾倾城怒了。“你不是信佛吗?吃什么肉!”“信佛的是我母妃,本王只是陪她信佛而已!”……妈的,这个假和尚!一番僵持,顾倾城妥协了。“好吧……清蒸?”“爆炒!”某人眸子灼灼盯着床上的人。“滚!”
  • 恋恋咖啡

    恋恋咖啡

    本书为你列举出了近百种咖啡,详细介绍了它们的特色,以及相关的知识和故事。它们或是浪漫感人,或是温馨动人,带你了解和熟悉咖啡的神奇魅力。书中还安排了一些咖啡爱好者的内容推荐,为介绍咖啡及与咖啡有关的新鲜事提供了平台。书中的创意部分会帮助你学到与咖啡有关的制作方法。为自己,为家人亲手煮上一杯浓情蜜意的咖啡吧,美味自不用说,单单那份做咖啡的心情就足以让人完全陶醉其中。口中品尝的是咖啡,而在心中品味的确是生活。入口苦涩,入喉甘甜,入心舒,生活之意尽显其中。如果你是一位热爱生活的人,那么你就很可能是一位喜欢咖啡的人。如果你心动了,那么就请你随我们一起来品味优质的的咖啡、品味雅致的生活吧。
  • 月中情

    月中情

    只是为了生存,可以去欺骗任何人,可以伤害任何人,只是没感情的杀手,但是看到你的那一刻,我觉得害怕,我开始挣扎,我发现自己爱上了不该爱的人,我到底该如何抉择,我为什么会爱上你,我明明知道你只是一个潜伏在我身边的杀手,我到底该拿你怎么办
  • 安徽咨议局章程

    安徽咨议局章程

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 修仙之天道录

    修仙之天道录

    穿越者都能很快适应异界?郑乾却是个例外。如果不是为了心爱的人。他宁愿平淡的过完一生。