It might be better that there should be no such thing as credit,that no one should lend money,and that everyone should be compelled to rely solely upon whatever ready money he may possess from day to day.
But if so,let us apply the principle all round;do not let us glory in our world-wide commerce and boast ourselves in our riches,obtained,in so many cases,by the ignoring of this principle.If it is right for a great merchant to have dealings with his banker,if it is indispensable for the due carrying on of the business of the rich men that they should have at their elbow a credit system which will from time to time accommodate them with needful advances and enable them to stand up against the pressure of sudden demands,which otherwise would wreck them,then surely the case is still stronger for providing a similar resource for the smaller men,the weaker men.At present Society is organised far too much on the principle of giving to him who hath so that he shall have more abundantly,and taking away from him who hath not even that which he hath.
If we are to really benefit the poor,we can only do so by practical measures.We have merely to look round and see the kind of advantages which wealthy men find indispensable for the due management of their business,and ask ourselves whether poor men cannot be supplied with the same opportunities.The reason why they are not is obvious.
To supply the needs of the rich is a means of making yourself rich;to supply the needs of the poor will involve you in trouble so out of proportion to the profit that the game may not be worth the candle.
Men go into banking and other businesses for the sake of obtaining what the American humourist said was the chief end of man in these modern times,namely,"ten per cent."To obtain a ten per cent.what will not men do?They will penetrate the bowels of the earth,explore the depths of the sea,ascend the snow-capped mountain's highest peak,or navigate the air,if they can be guaranteed a ten per cent.I do not venture to suggest that the business of a Poor Man's Bank would yield ten per cent.,or even five,but I think it might be made to pay its expenses,and the resulting gain to the community would be enormous.
Ask any merchant in your acquaintance where his business would be if he had no banker,and then,when you have his answer,ask yourself whether it would not be an object worth taking some trouble to secure,to furnish the great mass of our fellow countrymen,on sound business principles with the advantages of the credit system,which is found to work so beneficially for the "well-to-do"few.
Some day I hope the State may be sufficiently enlightened to take up this business itself;at present it is left in the hands of the pawnbroker and the loan agency,and a set of sharks,who cruelly prey upon the interests of the poor.The establishment of land banks,where the poor man is almost always a peasant,has been one of the features of modern legislation in Russia,Germany,and elsewhere.
The institution of a Poor Man's Bank will be,I hope,before long,one of the recognised objects of our own government.
Pending that I venture to throw out a suggestion,without in any way pledging myself to add this branch of activity to the already gigantic range of operations foreshadowed in this book--Would it not be possible for some philanthropists with capital to establish on clearly defined principles a Poor Man's Bank for the making of small loans on good security,or making advances to those who are in danger of being overwhelmed by sudden financial pressure--in fact,for doing for the "little man"what all the banks do for the "big man"?Meanwhile,should it enter into the heart of some benevolently disposed possessor of wealth to give the price of a racehorse,or of an "old master,"to form the nucleus of the necessary capital,I will certainly experiment in this direction.
I can anticipate the sneer of the cynic who scoffs at what he calls my glorified pawnshop.I am indifferent to his sneers.A Mont de Piete--the very name (Mount of Piety)shows that the Poor Man's Bank is regarded as anything but an objectionable institution across the Channel--might be an excellent institution in England.Owing,however,to the vested interests of the existing traders it might be impossible for the State to establish it,excepting at a ruinous expense.There would be no difficulty,however,of instituting a private Mont de Piete,which would confer an incalculable boon upon the struggling poor.
Further,I am by no means indisposed to recognise the necessity of dealing with this subject in connection with the Labour Bureau,provided that one clearly recognised principle can be acted upon.
That principle is that a man shall be free to bind himself as security for the repayment of a loan,that is to pledge himself to work for his rations until such time as he has repaid capital and interest.
An illustration or two will explain what I mean.Here is a carpenter who comes to our Labour shed;he is an honest,decent man,who has by sickness or some other calamity been reduced to destitution.He has by degrees pawned one article after another to keep body and soul together,until at last he has been compelled to pawn his tools.
