The wily Northampton, one may be certain, was fully aware of this possible weakness in the combination opposed to his advancement.He would be fully aware, that is, that it was there potentially; but when he began, as his activities would indicate, to work for the creation of that flaw in the relationship between Rochester and Overbury it is unlikely that he knew the flaw had already begun to develop.Unknown to him, circumstance already had begun to operate in his favour.
Overbury was Rochester's tutor in more than appertained to affairs of State.It is more than likely that in Carr's wooing of Lady Essex he had held the role of Cyrano de Bergerac, writing those gracefully turned letters and composing those accomplished verses which did so much to augment and give constancy to her ladyship's love for Rochester.It is certain, at any rate, that Overbury was privy to all the correspondence passing between the pair, and that even such events as the supplying by Forman and Mrs Turner of that magic powder, and the Countess's use of it upon her husband, were well within his knowledge.
While the affair between his alter ego and the Lady Essex might be looked upon as mere dalliance, a passionate episode likely to wither with a speed equal to that of its growth, Overbury, it is probable, found cynicalamusement in helping it on.But when, as time went on, the lady and her husband separated permanently, and from mere talk of a petition for annulment of the Essex marriage that petition was presented in actual form to the King, Overbury saw danger.Northampton was backing the petition.If it succeeded Lady Essex would be free to marry Rochester.And the marriage, since Northampton was not the man to give except in the expectation of plenty, would plant the unwary Rochester on the hearth of his own and Overbury's enemies.With Rochester in the Howard camp there would be short shrift for Thomas Overbury.There would be, though Rochester in his infatuation seemed blind to the fact, as short a shrift as the Howards could contrive for the King's minion.
In that march of inevitability which marks all real tragedy the road that is followed forks ever and again with an `if.' And we who, across the distance of time, watch with a sort of Jovian pity the tragic puppets in their folly miss this fork and that fork on their road of destiny select, each according to our particular temperaments, a particular `if' over which to shake our heads.For me, in this story of Rochester, Overbury, Frances Howard, and the rest, the point of tragedy, the most poignant of the issues, is the betrayal by Robert Carr of Overbury's friendship.Though this story is essentially, or should be, that of the two women who were linked in fate with Rochester and his coadjutor, I am constrained to linger for a moment on that point.
Overbury's counsel had made Carr great.With nothing but his good looks and his personal charm, his only real attributes, Carr had been no more than King James's creature.James, with all the pedantry, the laboured cunning, the sleezy weaknesses of character that make him so detestable, was yet too shrewd to have put power in the hands of the mere minion that Carr would have been without the brain of Overbury to guide him.Of himself Carr was the `toom tabard' of earlier parlance in his native country, the `stuffed shirt' of a later and more remote generation.But beyond the coalition for mutual help that existed between Overbury and Carr, an arrangement which might have thrived on a basis merely material, there was a deep and splendid friendship.`Stuffed shirt' or not, Robert Carr was greatly loved by Overbury.Whatever Overbury mayhave thought of Carr's mental attainments, he had the greatest faith in his loyalty as a friend.And here lies the terrible pity in that `if' of my choice.The love between the two men was great enough to have saved them both.It broke on the weakness of Carr.
Overbury was aware that, honestly presented, the petition by Lady Essex for the annulment of her marriage had little chance of success.But for the obstinacy of Essex it might have been granted readily enough.He had, however, as we have seen, forced her to live with him as his wife, in appearance at least, for several months in the country.There now would be difficulty in putting forward the petition on the ground of non- consummation of the marriage.
It was, nevertheless, on this ground that the petition was brought forward.But the non-consummation was not attributed, as it might have been, to the continued separation that had begun at the altar; the reason given was the impotence of the husband.Just what persuasion Northampton and the Howards used on Essex to make him accept this humiliating implication it is hard to imagine, but by the time the coarse wits of the period had done with him Essex was amply punished in ridicule for his primary obstinacy.
Sir Thomas Overbury, well informed though he usually was, must have been a good deal in the dark regarding the negotiations which had brought the nullity suit to this forward state.He had warned Rochester so frankly of the danger into which the scheme was likely to lead him that they had quarrelled and parted.If Rochester had been frank with his friend, if, on the ground of their friendship, he had appealed to him to set aside his prejudice, it might well have been that the tragedy which ensued would have been averted.Enough evidence remains to this day of Overbury's kindness for Robert Carr, there is enough proof of the man's abounding resource and wit, to give warrant for belief that he would have had the will, as he certainly had the ability, to help his friend.Overbury was one of the brightest intelligences of his age.Had Rochester confessed the extent of his commitment with Northampton there is little doubt that Overbury could and would have found a way whereby Rochester could have attained his object (of marriage with FrancesHoward), and this without jeopardizing their mutual power to the Howard menace.
